Scarlett Johansson’s Ongoing Lawsuit Against Disney Over Streaming Release Black Widow has drawn a lot of attention for its reflection on the shifting exit pattern of blockbuster movies, and there has been a lot of development in the suit since the star first dropped it off. While other actors have spoken of the loss of revenue resulting from the hybrid cinema / streaming releases of their films, Johansson’s case has become the most publicized due to his long-standing relationship with Disney and his global star status. . Here’s what you need to know.
Many major films have been repeatedly delayed or reworked due to the covid-19 pandemic, but the black Widow the journey to liberation has been one of the most difficult. Originally slated for a premiere on May 1, 2020, the film has been postponed several times during the pandemic. Over a year later, Black Widow finally hit theaters on July 9, 2021, alongside a simultaneous streaming release via Disney + Premier Access. The streaming release grossed $ 67 million in its opening weekend alone, contributing hugely to the film’s overall take.
Black Widow received much praise from critics and was seen as a major return to form for the film industry as a whole after months of closures and delays. However, the hybrid release model ended up drawing the wrath of Johansson, which led to the ongoing lawsuit against Disney. Since then, the suit has developed in an interesting way, with both sides standing up and firing a few shots the other way around.
Scarlett Johansson sues Disney over Black Widow release
Just a few weeks later Black Widow At the premiere, it was announced that Johansson was suing Disney for the movie’s streaming model, citing a breach of contract. The lawsuit accused Disney of costing the star a substantial part of its compensation owed by cutting ticket sales at theaters, claiming that “Disney intentionally tricked Marvel into breaking the deal, without justification, in order to prevent Ms. Johansson from taking full advantage of her market with Marvel.” Because many stars are paid based on the performance of their films, and other viewing options have been shown to decrease movie attendance, the lawsuit argued that Disney unfairly undermined Johansson by releasing Black Widow on Disney +.
How much is the release of Disney + of Black Widow Scarlett Johansson
Under his contract, Johansson’s compensation was largely tied to the black Widow box office performance. As such, the movie’s streaming premiere cost him around $ 50 million. Much of that loss, according to the lawsuit, was due to Disney’s refusal to renegotiate its contract after the hybrid exit plan decision. Johansson’s team alleged that Disney had claimed it would renegotiate as part of such a release plan – which other studios like Warner Bros. did during the pandemic with the stars of their films – but failed to do so, which cost him a lot.
Disney’s responses to Scarlett Johansson’s trial
In response to Johansson’s claims, the Disney legal team released a statement claiming the lawsuit had “no merit” and call it “Sad and heartbreaking in its callous disregard for the horrific and prolonged global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. ” The company claimed that the black Widow the hybrid release plan was entirely within the confines of Johansson’s contract, and the streaming premiere may even have “Improved his ability to earn extra pay.” On an earnings call soon after, Disney CEO Bob Chapek dubbed the release of Disney + Premier Access, saying it was the right move and largely bypassing Johansson’s claims that the company had reached satisfactory agreements at the time of the pandemic with many other players.
Reactions to the response to Disney’s Scarlett Johansson trial
Following Disney’s dismissive response to Johansson’s allegations, reports indicate that the star has been shocked. Reported sources within his team claimed the implied animosity was troubling for the star, although little explanation has been given. Johansson’s agent Bryan Lourd has expressed his thoughts on the situation more publicly, releasing his own official response to Disney’s statement in late July. Heavy said that disney “Shamelessly and falsely accused Ms Johansson of being callous to the global COVID pandemic, in an attempt to make her appear as someone they and I know she is not.” He highlighted the many contributions Johansson has made to Disney over the years, called the company’s statement “Direct attack on his character”, and reiterated his team’s claim that the switch to Disney + was in breach of his contract.
Three different organizations focused on equity and empowering women in the industry – Time’s Up, ReFrame and Women in Film – issued a joint statement in response to Disney’s sharp words to Johansson. The statement took no position with respect to the actual legal dispute, but characterized Disney’s response as “Sexist attack”, claim that such a language “Has no place in a trade dispute and contributes to an environment in which women and girls are seen as less able than men to protect their own interests without being subject to ad hominem criticism.”
Kevin Feige’s response to the release of Black Widow Disney +
Apparently, Johansson’s supporters throughout the legal ordeal with Disney include Marvel Studios director Kevin Feige. In its widely circulated What I hear … bulletin, old THR editor Matt Belloni claimed that Feige was “Angry and embarrassed” and even “p * ssed” on the hybrid version model for Black Widow and Disney’s response to Johansson’s allegations. Per Belloni, Feige has always wanted an exclusively theatrical release for the film and fully supported Johansson’s reward attempt when she filed a lawsuit against the company.
Disney’s decision to avoid trial in Scarlett Johansson trial
The most recent development in the Johansson / Disney /Black Widow The lawsuit took place in late August when it was reported that Disney was seeking to avoid a lawsuit with Johansson by pushing for arbitration. In the arbitration clause, Disney made several claims defending once again the black Widow streaming and claiming not to have violated any part of the star’s contract, even comparing the film’s box office performance favorably to other MCU entries. It remains to be seen in whose favor the case will ultimately fall.
Regardless of how the arbitration ends up playing out, much of the indirect work for Johansson’s actions is already underway. A wider discussion of compensation in the modern era of movie releases has opened, and Disney’s accusatory responses to Johansson’s claims have sparked significant public backlash, tarnishing the company’s image. ‘a way that can take a long time to repair. It will certainly be interesting to see how the Black Widow the trial ends up unfolding, regardless of the final resolution.
Next: All 14 Marvel Movies Released After Loki (& When)
- Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021)Release Date: Sep 03, 2021
- Eternals (2021)Release date: 05 November 2021
- Spider-Man: No Path Home (2021)Release Date: December 17, 2021
- Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022)Release Date: March 25, 2022
- Thor: Love and Thunder (2022)Release date: 06 May 2022
- Black Panther: Wakanda Forever / Black Panther 2 (2022)Release Date: 08 Jul 2022
- Wonders / Captain Marvel 2 (2022)Release Date: November 11, 2022
- Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania (2023)Release Date: February 17, 2023
- Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 (2023)Release date: 05 May 2023
Bob Ross Inc. criticizes Netflix documentary as inaccurate
About the Author